Wednesday, September 21, 2011

"I Don't Eat Monkey Brain."



What do race and religion have to do with each other? Well, in the Indian Americans’ case, they have a lot to do with each other. Often times people assume that that all Middle Easterners are a certain religion based alone on the color of their skin. As an African American male living in New York City I can relate, a little. Being judged or assumed of a certain characteristic trait because of the way you look is unfair to me.  Indian Americans are also a victim of this racial profiling. “In 1923. the U.S. Supreme Court in U.S. v. Bhagat Singh Thind concluded that although Indians were “classified by certain scientific authorities as of the Caucasian or Aryan race,” they were in fact nonwhite according to “the understanding of the common man.” So based on the popular belief that Indian Americans were not white because of their skin color, it was made so. Does this mean that if enough people believe that snow is in fact balls of cotton dropping from the sky, then it will be known as so, even though it isn’t true?

The "Racialization of Religion” has to do with the association of a religion based on race. Indian Americans are assumed to be of a certain faith because of their “skin the color of mocha.” Khyati Y Joshi (New roots in America's sacred ground: religion, race, and ethnicity in Indian America, Rutgers U. Press, 2006) provides an example about this when talking about Shiren’s school friends, whose ignorance to religion were made obvious by asking Shiren is she and her family ate monkey brains at home. Apparently her friends’ only expertise on Hinduism went as far as watching Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.

By: Jason Jeremiah

Monday, September 12, 2011

Sophists in Business





Lawyers and advertisers are sophists that are very prevalent today, have been for centuries, and will continue to be until the end of time. When a lawyer’s job is to defend a person he or she is assigned to, whether they are innocent or not, ethics are pretty much thrown out the window. Lawyers play to win to further their career. In other words their professional responsibilities and goals override what is right. They know that stepping into this field leads to bending the truth or wording a phrase/question in a certain way can manipulate a person’s mind into thinking the way you want them to.
Same goes for advertisers. When a company says that their product is the best, then try to convince the viewer that it is so by showing a graphic of a survey that may or may have not taken place, that may or may have not been worded in a way to sway the surveyed, it makes you wonder if the truth is being bent. Another example of truth bending are the advertisements with Pepsi and Coke taste challenges. If Pepsi held a taste challenge to a large group of people, recorded it, and had the results come out negatively then do you think that they would showcase the challenge on their commercial? No. They will only do so if the results came out in their favor. So if a taste challenge comes out in Coca-Cola’s favor 5 out of 7 challenges then only showing the 2 winning challenges would be bending the truth, just a little. Is it wrong? It depends. Dealing with business, you sometimes have to be a certain way even if it is wrong. It would be nice not to be lied to or misled in anything, but there aren’t many ways to know for sure who is lying and who isn’t so it’s best to always look at your options in a fair and logical way.


Want to see this in action? Just watch the TV Shows "Mad Men" & "Law & Order." Those illustrate my point exactly.

- By: Jason Jeremiah

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

WWE Couldn't resist.



I thought that CM Punk returned too soon. He left for only 8 days? They had a bunch of matches on RAW that ultimately became pointless now that Punk is back. Punk got on the mic after RAW went off the air and said that he was back. You can make comparison's between HBK and Razor from Wrestlemania when they had 2 I.C. titles suspended up in a ladder match to determine the "real" I.C. champ but this is a bit different. CM Punk beat Cena, Razor didn't beat HBK leading up to the Mania match. It would have been nice for them not to rush CM Punk back like that, but I guess they believed that it was the only way to make Summerslam feel special. I'm not sure how it makes sense for him to comeback since "the dufus son-in-law" is running the company. What could HHH say to Punk to make it worth his while? I mean, other than offering Stephanie's services. The storyline isnt completely fucked up, but dreams of a new fresh era dont seem quite the same. Cena WILL stay strong and win all his feuds until he meets Rock at Wrestlemania. Move Punk over to Smackdown so he can have his own show.

Friday, July 8, 2011

Vince McMahon, Wrestling's Gatekeeper





Vincent Kennedy McMahon goes by many adjectives. Demanding, pompous, greedy, intimidating, smart, and coldhearted are all ways of describing this well-known businessman. He is the current CEO and owner of World Wrestling Entertainment. Born in 1945 he was raised into the wrestling industry. He is a 3rd generation wrestling promoter. Vince McMahon holds the title of chairman, producer, and gatekeeper.

Vince McMahon decides everything, and I mean everything. Of the company’s four WWE television shows nothing makes the air without his consent. He controls where the wrestling events are held, who wrestles that night, and the outcomes of matches and segments. He is the true sense of the word gatekeeper. In most cases he controls how audiences react. Through basic storytelling he can make crowds do what he wants them to do. Gatekeepers control our destiny in some cases. In the case of Vince McMahon he controls the destiny of the wrestlers that he hires and presents. Since wrestling is scripted and not a real sport, McMahon holds all the cards. Boxing, tennis, and ultimate fighting are sports that involve one on one competition in which the winning purse is completely controlled by them. Vince pays the most to the main eventers that he decides should be in the main event, while those who are left off of events may not get paid at all.

McMahon is known for being a very strict boss. Some say that wrestlers who work for him are afraid to request time off to heal because it would look like they aren’t as dedicated to the wrestling business as those who don’t need to take time off. Vince McMahon is seen as a gatekeeper that for the most part isn’t seen as ethical. “As long as it makes him money, then it’s good for business” is the attitude that he often comes across as having. An example of why he gets this reaction is one that dated back to 1987 and 1988. Several weeks after winning a championship in what would be known as the biggest match of his career at WrestleMania 3 Ricky Steamboat requested time off. He did so to be with his then pregnant wife, who was expecting his first son. This seems reasonable considering that the WWE (known as the WWF at the time) sent their performers out on the road over 250 days of the year, right? I couple months off. Well, that didn’t sit well with Vince McMahon. Steamboat took time off anyway and when he returned he was not used as prominently as he had originally been. Who needs ethics when business is involved?


Many have benefited and many have lost as a result of McMahon’s decisions. Thousands of wrestlers have benefited throughout the years being that the WWE have given them a platform to be noticed by millions of viewers. The most well-known of these who have benefited are Hulk Hogan, Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson, “Macho Man” Randy Savage, Steve Austin, Bruno Sammartino, John Cena, and Ric Flair. Wrestlers who have lost lives due to the pressure of maintaining a certain look (via unnatural means) include dozens and dozens of wrestlers such as Andrew “Test” Martin, Edward Fatu, Eddie Guerrero, Lance Cade, Ray “Big Bossman” Traylor, and Davey Boy Smith. The later list caused McMahon’s decisions to backfire on him publically and personally.
In McMahon was put on trail in 1994 when he was accused of distributing steroids to his wrestlers. Several of McMahon’s former employees testified against him, stating that Vince encouraged them to start using steroids. He was acquitted of charges and he admitted to taking steroids himself. An interesting note is that arguably the biggest star in the history of the WWE, Hulk Hogan, became the star witness that testified against McMahon.

In 2006 the WWE created a health program named “The Talent Wellness Program” that is a comprehensive drug, alcohol, and cardiac screening program. The policy tests for recreational drug use and abuse of prescription medication. Under the guidelines of the policy, talent is also tested annually for pre-existing or developing cardiac issues. The drug testing is handled by Aegis Sciences Corporation. The effects of steroid use are still not as well-known as other drugs because steroids are still relatively new. Enlarge hearts of wrestlers is a reoccurring, trending side effect that wrestlers have gone through, years after the drug abuse had stopped. Still, scientists learn more and more about what it can do to the human body over time

Vince McMahon’s helping to create an environment in which drugs were frequently used eventually caught up to the company in 2007 when top star, Christopher Michael Benoit, had his life end in a double murder–suicide where he killed his wife, son, and them himself. This murder revealed a couple of things, one being that the 40 year old wrestler had steroids in his system and in his house. Reports showed that Benoit had a testosterone level of 207 micrograms per liter and an epitestosterone level of 3.5 mcg/L for a testosterone to epitestosterone ratio of 59:1. Considering that most people have a 1:1 ratio and some have a 10:1 ratio, this was an even bigger eye opener that the WWE still had problems. Tests were conducted on Benoit's brain head of neurosurgery at West Virginia University, Julian Bailes/ Result of those tests showed that Benoit's brain was so severely damaged that it resembled the brain of an 85-year-old Alzheimer's patient. So there are many criticisms to Vince McMahon’s gatekeeping habits but he has many positives as well.

The WWE is the top contributor in grants for the Make a Wish program. They have also recently started a campaign that encourages against bullying, the “Be a Star” campaign. The mission of this campaign is to get people, primarily children, to show tolerance and respect to ensure a positive social environment for everyone regardless of race, religion, or sexual orientation. Gatekeepers have the ability to control and effect the way people live. Gatekeepers have the authority to control what people see and what people don’t see. McMahon is a gatekeeper that isn’t uncommon when talking about owners of small and large companies. I guess it’s a gene thing.

By: Jason Jeremiah

Friday, July 1, 2011

Google Search Engines




Google’s choice to proceed with a modified version of its Chinese search engine isn’t any of my business. In other words, whatever Chinese government and Google agree on, I agree on. It’s China, and China should be run however they see fit, as long as lives aren’t being risked, which in this case it isn’t. I don’t agree with censoring a person’s view on a subject or respected public figure, but it’s their company, their rules. If you don’t agree with the views of your country, I would suggest that you either protest against it, hoping for a change or leave. Not everyone is going to agree on an issue such as this. The Google motto “Don’t be evil,” referred to Google’s competitors who Google believed exploited their users/readers to certain content. I think that censoring opinions goes against their motto. Google is a hypocrite if they do not see that they’re doing what they stated that their oppositions use to do.

The article does not make me feel differently about Google because I never look at large corporations with a close eye. Although I probably should, that never came to mind before. Since I’ve starting using the internet my daily searches would include Google or Yahoo. I have tried sites like Ask.com, Msn.com, Dogpile.com, and Bing.com, but none of the list results are as on point to what I am looking for as Google has been. Like the “Esse Est indicato in Google” states many people use Google.com as their library. Students like myself “google it” instead of researching it at a local library so the information that Google and any other search engine provides is crucial. The information of the past can affect a child’s future and Google needs to realize that nest time they decide to censor something. I would buy stock in Google because business and personal shouldn’t mix and no matter what I think Google will be profitable for years to come.

I think that Google tracking regional trend searches is a good thing. This would be a great gauge for what local residents are searching for. This would help advertisers, news television and radio stations. Google collecting medical information is a great thing. It can prepare hospitals ahead of time just in case they get an abnormal amount of patients that need the same treatment. As long as identities of the searchers aren’t being released or investigated then I completely agree with the premise that it’s better to be prepared than not.

By Jason Jeremiah

Sunday, June 26, 2011

My Wrestlemania 28 Dream Card



Headliner: John Cena vs The Rock, No DQ match

This match is a match similar to Rock vs. Hogan and to a lesser extent, on a much lower scale, Piper vs. Bret. This match involves 2 wrestlers that at one time were the most popular wrestler in the WWE. Rock, the charismatic man with the ego to match his fan base was a wrestler that left the crowd wanting more, more often than not. He wasn’t technically great in the ring, but his facial expressions and other aspects of selling was one of the things that made him credible inside the ring as a face. His generation of fans appealed to the 18-35 demographic as well as to the younger crowd, unlike his counterpart, John Cena.

When John Cena first started out his innovative rap gimmick was what captured the attention of the WWE crowd. He had the attention of both the young and adults, but somewhere along the way (specifically when he was drafted over to RAW) he became a lesser star in the eyes of the adults and more to children. His Superman-like character is what sets him apart from many wrestlers in history. He never rarely ever loses clean. Just like Andre, just like Bruno, Just like Hogan, just like Austin, and just like…Rock. This match would seem like a passing of the torch, but really it wouldn’t be. Believe it or not, but John Cena has been on top longer than Rock, by double in years. It doesn’t seem that way, but that just goes to show how popular Rock was at his peak. Would John Cena cement his place in wrestling history by defeating 1 half of the most popular star of the WWE’s biggest era, or would he know his role?

Neither wrestler is exactly Bret Hart or Shawn Michaels inside of the ring, so this match would be No DQ, giving the wrestlers time to take shortcuts with weapons if need be.



Undertaker’s Streak: Sting vs. Undertaker, No DQ match



Potential Show Stealer: CM Punk vs. “Stone Cold” Steve Austin



Celebrity Attraction: Big Show vs. Shaq (celebrity attraction)

Potential Show Stealer: Kurt Angle vs Jack Swagger

Potential Show Stealer: Christian vs. Daniel Bryan

Double Turn: Miz vs. Triple H

Money in the Bank: Santino, Ziggler, Kofi, Barrett, Cody, Morrison, Bourne, Del Rio

Friday, June 24, 2011

Technology and it's Affect on How We Receive News

Technological advancements throughout the past 25 years have transcended the way news is gathered, discussed, shown, and saved. I mean, no longer do you have to save a newspaper article if you want to read it later. Now you can bookmark it, or save it on your iPhone. No longer do you need to leave the living room or even get up to turn on the radio in order to get the latest news. Now you just have to click on your homepage to get the biggest news stories of the morning. The way information is received has affected the perception of authority and reliability.





Google, everyone uses it, and if you say that you don’t then you probably aren’t aware of it. Google has controlled the way hundreds of millions of people find out things. Google, which owns YouTube, is a news source. It’s not perceived that way but it is. As a result, reliability is a big factor. Causal users often take what they see in a headline as fact so they are vulnerable to popular news sources online. This gives large news sources a lot of power politically, but it makes them accountable for the information that they provide. Are these changes due entirely to new technology?

I don’t believe that the greatness of technology is the sole reason for this movement. A large reason is because of McDonaldization. The process of McDonaldization takes tasks and breaks them down into smaller tasks over and over again until all tasks have been broken down to the smallest possible level. This process is how I understand culture to be. Examples of McDonaldization include emailing family members through a computer instead of writing a letter or paying someone a visit by foot. Often I would find myself going to my local library to find a book and it would either be sold out or not available. It’s easier now to search for it on Amazon or eBay where that particular book is more likely to be found. Often I would get the newspaper before school to get the results of a sports game. Instead of having to purchase a $0.50 newspaper I can find out the results, see the highlights, and get fan comments through ESPN, Facebook, and Twitter in a matter of seconds.



How will the internet continue to affect mass communications in the coming 5-10 years? What capabilities will the internet likely have? I don’t see YouTube going anywhere. I foresee YouTube using what Netflix has used to become popular. It wasn’t one of the top 3 features that made this company what it is today, but I see Netflix being ahead of the curve on surveys and taste preference questions. Netflix is very thorough when trying to figure out what the user likes, which then makes it easier for them to choose movies and shows that fit the users’ interests. I see YouTube doing this. I see them adding this as a feature when someone is signing up. “What type of movies did you like growing up? What would you rate your interest in love songs? Do you watch CNN, how often? Very often, not at all, or religiously? How interesting are you into Video bloggers?” Asking these along with taking into account the users’ age is a perfect way to recommend YouTube users without going through the hassle of searching. This wouldn’t be limited to only YouTube or dating sites, but to news websites as well. It would be a way to make users feel more of an attachment and loyalty to that particular site because the website knows them so well.

Written by Jason Jeremiah